Disaster as judgment for sin: Christian or Hindu belief?

There is a growing trend in the church and especially on the Christian websites today for people to stand up and pronounce each new disaster that appears in the headlines as punishment for the sins of the people who live in that area. Self-styled prophets everywhere are popping up out of the woodwork to proclaim that God has told them that He is waving His hands and directing tsunami, earthquake, and tornado to sinful parts of the world. They also say He tells them which disasters are judgment and which are not. We need to examine whether this holds true to Scripture and applies to the Christian living in today’s world, or if it is a dark doctrine and an unbiblical creed that needs to be rejected.

My Journey of Awakening

A long time ago as a child I was attending Catholic school and dutifully attended church every Sunday. As I grew into my teens, I gradually opened my eyes to the error of what I was being taught, and decided to do whatever it took to find out the true nature of God. Surely what the nuns taught us in grade school wasn’t the whole story about God. When I enrolled in university, after taking some commerce courses and quickly realizing this was not the path I wanted, I chose to major in Asian Studies. This would give me a grounding in what many ancient civilizations had to say about God, and I thought perhaps the truth could be found there. After all, Alan Watts had popularized Zen Buddhism in the Sixties. The Woodstock generation and the Maharishi had made experimentation with conciousness expansion very trendy, so I thought this might be my path to learning about God.

I was taught that Hinduism and Buddhism, two of the large religions in Asia, were based on the law of karma. This law, simply stated, says that wholesome actions result in eventual happiness and security for oneself and others, while unwholesome actions have the opposite result, they result in suffering and loss for oneself and others. Everything was essentially illusion, and the path to God was a path inward, a journey of self-discovery. Hinduism taught that the Creator and the creation were one and the same. During deep trances in Yoga practice, as well as with hallucinogenic drugs, people seemed to be actually feeling this sense of the oneness of the universe. How exhilarating to be taught that I and God were one and the same! This was certainly an interesting concept, and it was understandable why many found it appealing. It meant one was free from any debt to a creator, and that a person was master and commander of his own fate. If one did good works, his  happiness and safety were assured, and if one chose to  sin, surely disaster would strike them.  This was how the universe worked in Hindu theology.

I remember asking my professors about the law of karma. How was it that some of the most gentle and peace-loving people of the world were often the ones hit by major disaster? If there was truly a direct cause and effect relationship between the righteousness of our works and our degree of worldly comfort, success, and safety, why would countries like India and other Asian nations be so poverty stricken and prone to disastrous events, when it was such a large center of Hinduism and Buddhism? They would just smile and shrug their shoulders, but they never really had an answer for me.

I continued with these beliefs for many years, but always with a nagging doubt just beneath the surface. If all was one, then there was no distinction between good and evil. This was unsettling to me. If all karma was the same, good was the same as evil. Then life was reduced to an absurdity. If all was illusion, then how could I trust any concept, including the concept that all was illusion? Surely God could not be trusted, if He was evil as well as good. Adding to my confusion was this whole karma issue. I saw so many corrupt people succeed in life, and so many good people fail and suffer loss, that it was hard to construe how the karmic laws held any real truth, when it was so clear that our degree of virtue did not dictate our station, rank, or physical security in the material world. I continued in this conflict for a great deal of time, always wondering how reality could be so conflicted with itself.

Many years later I finally had a breakthrough moment when the Holy Spirit spoke to me in the heart region, and I awakened to the truth of Jesus Christ and the work done on the cross. Of course! The Creator and the creation are distinct from each other! God is truly good, and evil is a condition of man and the world that must be overcome before abiding with God in heaven. It was not cycles of reincarnation to develop better karma that erased this sin, but the Lord Jesus Christ! One could not escape disaster on this earth by being good and spreading “good vibes” all about. Disaster ocurred to all, sinner and saint, because all were bound by the same physical laws while on earth. A great shroud of darkness was lifted from me. I began to devote much time to the Bible, and threw away my library of New Age books.

One of the first passages I remember reading was from Matthew Chap.7, where it says “Ask, and it will be given to you, seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.”At last I knew, that because I had diligently sought after Him all my life, He was answering my knocking at the door by revealing Himself to me. Even though we sometimes look in all the wrong places, God keeps His word and answers us, simply because we ask to know Him.

I began to understand what Matthew 5:45 meant.“For He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” It was not only the “good” people who enjoyed safety and security in this world, and it was not the only the “bad” people who suffered loss and pain. Calamitous events and hardships were natural conditions of the decaying world we live in, and all who live in this world are subject to these conditions. The goal of life was not to conquer difficulty and hardship, but to glorify God and allow Him to use these experiences in our life to shape and mold us to be ready to spend all eternity with Him. I understood immediately that God’s ways were not our ways. What seemed on the surface to be unjust was part of a greater plan, a plan for redemption and eternal life with the Lord, and it was more just and fair than anything we could imagine with our human minds. The apostle Paul put it so well in his letters to the churches that these hardships were nothing compared to the glory to come! Indeed, suffering could be for the glory of God, not something to be escaped by acting “good.”

As the internet became a popular outlet for Christian ministries and broadcasts I found many that were very uplifting and helpful in increasing my knowledge of the Bible and God’s ways. Surely this was a powerful way to fulfill the great commission of sending the good news of the gospel to all corners of the world. But I kept running across some websites that seemed to run contrary to what I thought God had just revealed to me, and the lessons taught in Scripture by Jesus and the apostles. I noticed a common theme that ran throughout some of these Christian internet websites that dismayed me. This was to the effect that those who sin are sent terrible sufferings and hardships in this world by God in retribution for their sins, and that this judgment was played out through the big disasters that struck some nations. I was starting to feel the same sense of conflict I had felt in my study of the Hindu and Buddhist faiths. They were preaching that when we do good, things went smoothly and the seas were always calm, with safety and success assured, even under calamitous situations. But commit sinful acts, and catastrophe would strike.

It seemed that these people believed God was extracting retribution from His flock over the sin issue, even after the monumental sacrifice of His Son on the cross. Since it was pretty clear to me that disasters hit Christians as well as non-Christians, and only a charlatan would try to say there were no believers affected by a large-scale disaster, this made no sense to me. This was passed on as Biblical doctrine, and some even called it “prophetic revelation”, but it clearly didn’t reflect the teachings of Christ. Christ taught that disaster victims were no more sinful than anyone else. (Luke 13:1-5) As I investigated further into this conflict, I began to see the true nature of these beliefs: it was their own human desire that the wicked should come to a terrible end here on earth, and that good people should be spared suffering because of their virtue and right-standing with the Lord. They were teaching that justification of ourselves before God was a process we undertook and completed ourselves, and we were strongly warned to get this process under way before the next disaster came to our town, or we would be swept away along with all the other victims. This was so clearly their will they were stating, not the will of God. I heard the preachers say we needed to clean our slate with God, so we could continue to enjoy a safe, secure life free from calamity and disaster here on earth. They didn’t tell us it was a future glory that we needed to prepare for, and clean our slate for.

These people who called themselves Christian prophets were telling their audience that we can act as judge and jury for God, by declaring this nation or that nation to be suffering because of its sin, when the truth is that it is actually so far out of our sphere of influence to make this determination. I began to ask myself, what is the difference between this teaching and what I was being taught at university about the law of karma? Is this not essentially the same doctrine, that when we are good, we are spared suffering, and when we are sinful, the tornado or tsunami will strike our house? Was this not the same karmic teaching that we are the masters and commanders of our own fate? By “getting right” with God, and somehow washing our own lives of sin, which most Christians know can only be accomplished by the blood of Christ, are we going to open up some kind of portal that will enclose us and our families in a cocoon of safety? But by now I was a whole lot older, and a little bit wiser, and I was determined not to be fooled again by this false creed that had the created usurping the role of the Creator.

Flash forward to today’s world. Disasters striking all about, suffering throughout the world. The thunderous drumbeat of “judgment, judgment, judgment” is echoing louder and louder. For much of the church today, and especially with the internet ministries that seem to be accountable to no one, it is considered incontrovertible fact that those who are hit by disaster have received judgment for their sins. Japan, New Zealand, China, Haiti, New Orleans, in one nation after the other, we are told these people sinned against God, and are receiving their payback for that sin.  Of course, according to their verdicts, the U.S. is the worst sinner, and every twister and storm that appears on the horizon is God lashing out. There is no recognition of geological or meteorlogical occurrances in their world. All is divine retribution, and woe to anyone who questions this. We are seeing the crossover of this same karmic doctrine of the Hindu religion into the church today, all dressed up in Christian terminology, with the word “judgment” substituted for “karma”. 

In 2008, after the China earthquake that killed over 60,000 people, actress Sharon Stone made a statement to the press that the Chinese had it coming to them, for the way they had treated the Tibetans. This was their karma. Of course, there was a great outcry, and she was condemned by leaders from all walks of life, and rightly so. Pointing a finger of human judgment at the actions of a nation right after a huge loss of life can easily be seen for the despicable thing that it is, even by those who are not Christian. Why is it that these internet ministers are given a free pass to do the exact same thing after each new disaster, and everyone shouts “hallelujah, brother” and proclaims them to be such great prophets and men of God? In an attempt to further gain the respect and credibility of their listening audience, they claim God speaks to them after each disaster and confirms that it was His judgment! Even Sharon Stone never went so far as to say God told her those things, and to her credit she apologized later.

The church becomes a news bureau

It is astonishing in today’s Christianity how stridently people defend their prophets. When anyone stands up to say “wait a minute, that’s not what I’m reading in the Bible”, they are quickly shouted down by defenders of the internet oracles, usually with some verse from Old Testament scripture that tells about a judgment God sent against a nation. This is supposed to quash any further discussion of the matter, and stifle any more doubt that these people are really getting their divine judgment bulletins straight from the Lord’s newsdesk. It seems many of these people are wannabe journalists. They missed their real calling, and instead are trying to combine ministering the word of God with news reporting. Indeed, an internet prophet/judgment watchman who has long been based out of Florida has for some time now been receiving donations from listeners to close a deal on a shiny new office complex to house, among other things, a state of the art studio to be used as a 24-hour Christian news broadcast center.* Surely a humble, spirit-led way to invest Christian tithes and offerings. That way we will learn what’s on God’s mind immediately as each new disaster unfolds! Perhaps they can run a scrolling news text at the bottom of the screen to list the sins committed by the victims. ………James 4:6 God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.

What the Bible says

Romans 8:1-2:

There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death. ….ESV

The completed work of Christ on the cross has washed away sin and its effects for all believers. The cost on our part is simply to have faith. This work is complete and finished. It is not an ongoing process. No part of this work remains to be done in the future. We who believe in the Son and His work, have been absolved of all condemnation for sin. It does not mean that we are freed from the death of our physical bodies, or suffering in this world. It also does not mean that we don’t still sometimes struggle with sin, or that we don’t need repentance in our lives, and the forgiveness that comes from repentance. We still live under all the rules that apply to a fallen world. What it does mean is that no matter how saintly we become, we will have tribulation in this world. Jesus told this to the apostles, who themselves cheerfully accepted much suffering in their lives.(John 16:33). Did He say that if we righted the sin debt to the Father we would be spared from suffering?

The tsunamis and earthquakes will come, and will strike the homes of Christian believers as well as the homes of non-believers. But the Lord has promised us we are free from condemnation for sin, so we know by simply putting our trust in the word of the Lord, that whatever happens is for our greater good. If we are struck by disaster, or some other accident, that it is not our karma hitting back at us. We can rest assured that it is a part of a greater plan that we cannot at this time fully understand, because God’s ways are far above our ways. We can know that it is something God is working out for our greater good. Romans 8:28 assures us: “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good.”

If God really wanted to send death and destruction to all who sin in today’s world, how many people would wake up tomorrow? Because this idea of disaster as payback for the sin of true believers is so problematic when weighed against Scripture, I have felt for a long time that the next logical step for the “judgment prophets” to take, to avoid having to rethink their theology, is to try and convince their listeners that these disasters won’t strike your house if you are right with God. Guess what? This is exactly what some of them are beginning to suggest.

These days many false teachers have a vested interest in keeping in play this idea that every earthquake crushes and every tsunami drowns because God perceives the sin in that region to be more intolerable than the sin in other areas. And what about the thousands of true believers who get caught up in the destruction? Is the same God who once parted the Red Sea to allow safe passage for the Israelites, and then closed it on the pursuing Egyptian soldiers, now unable to step forward and protect His own from the disasters he supposedly sends as judgment today? Is God not just as powerful today as He was in the past? Or are the seers and oracles of the internet not getting the story straight?

Since they have been shouting “judgment” to their listening audience for years, it is unthinkable for them to change course now. They are fully committed to the doctrine that either all or nearly all disaster is sent by the direct hand of God as punishment for sin. Think about it for a moment – when was the last time a major disaster ocurred when these people said it wasn’t judgment, it was just a natural event? They don’t even wait for the cleanup effort to begin before pronouncing each new disaster the work of God. Thankfully more and more Christians are reading their Bibles and questioning how this can be so, or at least asking how anyone could know God’s mind so well as to state for certain it is so with any particular disaster. In fact these soothsayers are getting so worried that their judgment proclaimations are untenable, that they are now embellishing the story. The newest wrinkle in their storyline is to infer that the tornados and tsunamis leave the homes of good, repentant Christians untouched.

On a recent internet broadcast, given by a self-professed internet “watchman” who is not reluctant to refer to himself as a modern-day prophet, I was astounded to hear this:

“Tears are coming to families you may know, tears may visit your household. The judgment is going to go up and down the streets of America; the judgment is going to go up the sidewalks of America, and past the houses. Its going to walk past your house. And when it goes past your house, will it stop and make a visitation at your house? Or will it continue and go on to the next house because you are dwelling in the secret place of God? Because you are totally submitted to God, and you have answered the heart’s cry of God from the Holy Spirit to get your house in order. You have submitted your heart to God. You have cleaned up your house. You have cleaned up your act.” **

Sure, repentance is essential, but teaching repentance from sin with the goal of saving yourself or your life savings from a hurricane or tornado is not part of Christian theology. Repentance is feeling sorry for disobedience to the heavenly Father, and any others who may have been harmed, and making things right when possible. It is a process where we truly feel an abhorrance for our sin. It has nothing to do with being a bargaining chip in a deal with God to get Him to protect our worldly goods or even our physical health.. To state that if you clean up your act and get your house in order the next tornado will change course and leave your house untouched is a false doctrine.

Then the internet preacher went on to mention a person whose house in Alabama was left intact by the tornado that tore through his neighborhood, and quoted him as saying that the only thing that mattered as the tornado passed by, was his hope and faith in God. This is all part of God’s plan that disasters can be used to bring awareness of His mercy to the victims and near-victims. The clash with Biblical truth comes when the prophets strongly imply that these disasters won’t touch you or your family if you simply listen to their broadcasted advice and square up your sin situation with the Lord beforehand, and because of this, you will come out of the next storm unscathed. There is yet another clash with Biblical truth when the prophets claim to have the inside scoop on which disasters were judgment and which were not.

It is atonishing how many Christians today don’t see the error. They say, ” These people are good men of God, they speak the harsh truth that needs to be spoken.” They defend the teaching that Christ’s work is incomplete, and that we still need to clear up the matter of this sin problem, not because we are truly sorry, and are truly repentant and desiring forgiveness, but to be spared from the next disaster. They accept the teaching that, through the strength of their will, along with aligning themselves with the correct prophet or watchman, and “cleaning up their act”, they have the power within themselves to survive worldly calamity and not suffer loss. The “master and commander of our own fate” theory raises its ugly head again, this time all worded nicely for the Christian audience. Contrary to any need to hear this falsity, are we not all called to warn about false teachings so that our brothers in Christ may not stumble?

How can teaching repentance in this manner cause one to stumble? Because it completely turns the concept of repentance upside down, making the goal of repenting a self-serving exercise designed to keep a tighter grip on our sense of safety and security in the physical world. In other words, they imply, if we sin less than our neighbor, our house will be the one still standing, while theirs gets destroyed. Another problem with this distorted teaching is that it instills a corrupt fear of the Lord in our hearts – the wrong kind of fear. The kind of fear that the Bible speaks of is a healthy respect for the Creator of the heavens and earth, not cowering in our closets hoping that through our goodness we have earned enough merit badges in God`s eyes that He will steer the approaching disaster away from our house. 

Helping bring souls to a saving knowledge of the Savior is what God desires, not putting our personal safety and the preservation of our worldly belongings above all other considerations. For me, the road of Christianity is a path that leads us constantly to become more like Jesus, and more obedient to His instructions. I am not aware of any occasion when Jesus taught survival techniques to the disciples, or told them to pray for the safeguarding of their personal property. He taught His followers to sell everything and follow Him, and that the Father in heaven would see to all their worldly needs.

Of course many people think of God after a disaster. This is how even the events we consider so horrible are used for good in God’s overall plan for mankind. Many may even come to accept the Lord after facing a near death situation, or even through losing a loved one. But this is not a license for preachers to state unequivically that every disaster is punishment for sin. If we want this to be an honest look at the evidence, we should not just look at one piece of evidence that appears to support our theory, like the one guy whose house was spared, and thanked God for his deliverance. We need to look at all the evidence. Why should we just interview the ones who escaped the impact of the disaster, and try to play up their escape as an example of how their “cleaning up their act” made the twister veer away from their house? How many homes of true, believing Christians are destroyed in each new disaster? Lets talk to all these actual victims of the disaster and console them, feed them, house them, and try to remind them of the great hope that we as Christians have of a glorious future to come. Victims of these traumatic events don’t need pseudo-prophetic types telling them  “you got what you deserved, because you didn’t clean up your act,” any more than they need Sharon Stone and her kooky karma comments.

I believe it is one of the most insidious heresies of our time that somehow God is overturning the pact made on the cross, and is so incensed at sin in the world that He is reigning disaster down on believers and non-believers alike, in a kind of wanton fury that punishes guilty and innocent alike.  Is God unable to control collateral damage and thus He is unable to protect His own from getting swept away along with the unbelievers? Why should we join in agreement when we hear these things? Should we not recognize this for what it is, a very belittling and diminished view of the sovereign Lord? Do we just shout in approval when we hear God deminished in this way, portrayed as limited in power and helplesss to protect His own?

Earthquakes tsunamis, tornados, hurricanes, all of these are part of this world. Jesus Himself said in John 16:33 “In this world you will have tribulation, but take heart; I have overcome the world.” This meant that while in this world, we are all subject to its laws, but God has prepared a kingdom for us where disaster doesn’t strike, and we will live forever. In no way was Christ telling us we can expect an exemption from the effects of disaster in this world, because we have sinned less than our neighbor, or we have struck a bargain with the Lord to be immunized against the effects of a fallen world. Jesus said to not fear that which can kill only the body, but to fear He who has authority to cast into hell. It is a complete corruption of God’s word to say that if we get our house in order, and straighten out our act, we will be in the house that is still standing after the tornado hits our neighborhood.

Not only do these judgment prophets say these things, they claim to get the information from God Himself, compounding the error. They tell us to flee, while there is still time. But where does one flee to escape God? You will not buy yourself an insurance policy by running to higher ground when the false prophets tell you to. These prophets should consider themselves blessed that the law of karma is not in effect, or they would have quite the karmic debt to pay for all the families they have uprooted with their messages to run from God’s judgment.

Its time to cut the survivalist mentality and get back to the Bible. There may be little time left, and knowing our Scripture in the endtimes is one of our keys to opening heaven’s gate, and helping as many as we can to know the great news of salvation being offered to all. God is delaying the final judgment, so that as many as possible can come to salvation. He is grieved if even one soul is lost. We have work to do ahead. Turn away from those who would steer you off the path. Ask God Himself what He would have you do, and where He would have you go. He invites us to knock on the door. He will answer. He always does.

…………….all blessings in Christ,

JD Ellis



**……Nathan Leal  http://www.watchmanscry.com/audio/Nathan_050311.mp3   @ 43:25 minutes

This entry was posted in False Prophecy. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Disaster as judgment for sin: Christian or Hindu belief?

  1. sabepashubbo says:

    Great stuff here, J.D.! Really enjoyed reading this. I think to say God is no longer acting as Judge would diminish His immutability, but to say that we know what God’s judgments actually are is foolish! How can we, limited in knowledge and understanding, claim to know what God’s purposes are? What an arrogant position.

    I think the root of this is an outward-focused Christianity. How often do we as Christians (myself included) look at what others are doing and break the command of Matthew 7:1? Why must we think we are better than God at determining the hearts of others? I have dealt with this problem for a really long time, and like all other sins, it is rooted in the sin of pride. When I make my Christian walk inward-focused, I am able to hear and understand so much more than when I try to make it about others.

    Still, I very much enjoyed reading this. Lots of good stuff to apply to my own life. Thanks for sharing!


  2. Thanks for the comment. I understand what you mean by taking an inward walk with Christ, but know that this only goes so far. We are walking with our brothers and sisters, so we need to make it about them, too, and not make it an isolated journey. When we see snares and traps ahead on the pathway, it is our calling to say something, not just to make safe passage for ourselves. When I visited India as a young man in university, I went to the holy places of the Hindu sages. These were people who were considered saints of the faith, and all they did in their entire lives was sit in a cave and meditate. This was their process of overcoming the world, but we know a better way with the Lord Jesus Christ. We must step out in faith and be an example for others, so that they can want what we have.
    All blessings in Christ……. JD Ellis

  3. sabepashubbo says:

    I agree with your last sentence entirely. It’s stepping out as an example, not a judge! :-)

  4. By the way, Matthew 7 is not a prohibition against all judging. Verse one cannot be taken out of context. The next verses explain what kind of judgment Jesus was condemning – hypocritical judgment like the Pharasees were doing. We are not to worry about the speck in another’s eye when we have a log in our own eye. In John 7:24, Jesus tells us to judge righteously – “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.” 1 John 4:1 tells us: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”

    Later on in Matthew 7 that we spoke about, Jesus says “beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing. You will recognize them by their fruits.” All through life we are using judgment and discernment. We also use it to recognize the fruit of those who say they speak for God. We don’t need to be politically correct when it comes to defending the faith. If someone claims to speak on behalf of the Lord, which these people certainly do, the Lord commands us to examine their fruit. The Bible tells us this will become more and more important as we enter the endtimes, with the rise of the great apostasy.

  5. Pingback: Disaster as Judgment for sin: Christian or Hindu belief? « Sola Dei Gloria

  6. fsslomko says:

    Good and insightful article. The same can be said about much of the teaching in the Church about tithing. Preachers put believers under a yoke of bondage and make void the cross of Christ when they insinuate that when one doesn’t tithe, they are under “the curse” of Malachi 3. They also pervert the grace of God by tying the blessings of God to whether one tithes or not making ones motive for giving to be to earn God’s blessing rather than out of pure love for Who He is and what He has done for us.

  7. bchaplin88 says:

    This is such an excellent article. Exactly what I needed to read.

    Most of these ‘prophets’, as you said, proclaim a false works-based Gospel of ‘do this, do that to maintain salvation’ without realizing that the good works are the result of our salvation.

    It really frustrates me when I hear: If you’re a Christian living in habitual sin, get right with God now by repentance and good works. Do we not remember that one sin leads to death and that even a foolish thought is sin?

    The message should be: If you’re a Christian living in habitual sin, question whether you’ve truly been re-born and place all your faith in Christ now.

    We can never and will never do enough to earn our salvation and, ironically, those who believe otherwise are the ones who should be questioning their faith rather than condemning others.

  8. Exactly that. These types twist scriptural truth to suit their own agendas. Good works and avoidance of as much sin as possible are fruits, or natural outcomes, of our election for salvation by God at the beginning of time. The works do not bring the salvation to us, as the false teachers insist. This is why we should reject any teaching that says: “get right with God, or you will be hit by the next calamity.”

    In addition to putting the cart before the horse, this false teaching also insinuates that bad things won’t happen to righteous Christians in this fallen world, another unscriptural belief. The Bible teaches that God works all things for our good. That would include things that the fearmongers tell us are calamities which can be avoided or lessened by “cleaning up our act” before God. Another variation on the same theme is the false teaching that if we just “make enough physical and spiritual preparations” in advance, disasters will have a weakened effect and not strike us as hard, because we were clever enough to think ahead and prepare, and thus outwit God’s plan.

    May God richly bless you,
    JD Ellis

  9. bchaplin88 says:

    Exactly. Repentance is the fruit of salvation, not the cause.

    I didn’t know how sinful fornication was before I got saved. However, once I was, I was automatically felt extreme guilt and sorrow after committing such acts, so much so that I no longer wanted to fornicate.

    That’s the gift of salvation and the glory of God!

    I believe the problem in the Church today is not the lack of holiness, but the lack of real converts that are coming from a general lack of the true doctrine and Gospel of salvation.

    Truth: Faith without works is dead because true salvation leads to works prepared in advance.
    Lie: Faith + works is required to obtain salvation.

    That subtle perversion redirects your faith in the finished work of Christ for righteousness to faith in your own works.

    It’s so frustrating when I hear people preach: “Narrow is the gate” to support false doctrine, without realizing that the narrow gate is Christ!

    “I am the way, the truth and the life, no one gets to the Father except through me”.

    Inevitably this understanding leads them to question the doctrine of eternal salvation which then begs the question: How could Paul tell the gentile believers that to die is gain if you’re never sure if you’re truly saved. How can we possibly not fear death if we are unsure whether we’ve done enough?

    I really hope God opens their eyes, for I’ve seen that some of these people have a real zeal for God, but aren’t preaching the truth.

    All glory to our God and Lord Jesus Christ.


  10. Many false teachers tell us we need to live each day in fear that we will lose our salvation. This is entirely untrue, as since we are chosen (elected) before we are born, then clearly we cannot undo God’s plan. “My sheep hear my voice” is a statement by Jesus that indicates those given to him by the father (those elected at the beginning of time) will hear the calling to salvation and persevere, and not be snatched away from his hands. I have heard false teachers tell us the phrase means that all Christians can hear prophetic voices from God.

    If we are truly chosen, as you correctly point out, we will be so filled with the Holy Spirit and love and gratitude that it will not be possible for us to fall by the wayside. We may still sin on occasion, but sin will no longer be our lifestyle. The calling to salvation is irresistible. God never intended for his chosen ones to live in fear that each new day could be the day when they become lost. The Good Shephard prayed to the Father (see John Chapter 17 – the High Priestly prayer) that none that are his shall be lost. God answers this prayer, assurring the perseverance of the saints.

    Some claim that Judas is an example of one who was called, and then fell away. Judas was not chosen for election, so he was never one of the flock. He was rather chosen to be the great betrayer before he was born. Millions of intricate details were worked out by God to ensure the parents of Judas were in the right place at the right time to conceive him where he would grow up to betray Jesus.


  11. bchaplin88 says:

    Hey, I don’t entirely agree with the doctrine of irresistible grace. I remember seeing a verse in the Old Testament that highlighted that the potter (God) didn’t have complete control over the clay because something (sin) got in the way. I know God is sovereign, but sin was not His will – just what He expected. I will hopefully find this verse very soon and post it.

    My take is that those He foreknew would accept the Gospel of Christ (not those he created especially to do so) He then predestined (kept safe) to hear it (His call) and then justified them (by faith in His Son).

    I’m not dogmatic of the view, but I believe that Calvinist ideology places all moral blame on God and also says that He will people to destruction, where we are told that He wills all to come to repentance.

    I understand God is sovereign, but I also believe He gave us the freewill to choose a side – it’s just that He knows our choice before we make it. He knew Pharoah would not ever submit to Him, thus he used his evil heart to achieve His own sovereign will.

    Anyway, again, I’m not dogmatic about this and it’s not a salvation issue :) I simply don’t believe that those who are given the Spirit can ever lose it because that appears to be saying that God makes a mistake and gives His Spirit to those that will eventually be cast into hell.

  12. bchaplin88 says:

    Jer 18:1 The word which came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,
    Jer 18:2 Arise, and go down to the potter’s house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words.
    Jer 18:3 Then I went down to the potter’s house, and, behold, he wrought a work on the wheels.
    Jer 18:4 And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it.
    Jer 18:5 Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
    Jer 18:6 O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay is in the potter’s hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.

    Verse 4.

  13. This general area of perseverance of the saints, free will, election, and predestination is the most fascinating area of study, for me at least. I have spent nearly 2 years now studying and researching what the bible has to say in these areas. I have devoured literally dozens of books presenting positions on all differing sides of these doctrines. I too, try hard not to be dogmatic about these issues, because they are so contentious and, as you point out, are not salvation issues. But I am a researcher at heart, and I will always be digging deeper to unlock the treasures of God’s word.

    While there is not enough space in the comment section to cover all the important verses and people have written volumes that only scratch the surface of these deep issues, I will try to put in a nutshell my beliefs after holding Scripture up to the light next to the various interpretations that exist.

    The Arminian view, which I used to hold to, is as follows: Salvation is granted to us because God peered into the future, and saw how we were going to respond to the Gospel, and how righteous we were going to be, and then ratified our choices. Those he foresaw would be deserving were granted salvation, and those who were not going to be deserving, were thus denied it. Jacob Arminius also held that even when having received salvation, we can stumble and lose it. I could not find anywhere in Scripture where either of these views held up to scrutiny. What I found in respect to foreseen faith were verses such as this:

    Romans 9:21-23

    Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory

    The clay never directs the potter in any way. I found that the Arminian view of foreseen faith was a human attempt to take a little portion of sovereignty away from God and transfer it into human hands, to arbitrarily instill some kind of “balance” between God’s sovereignty and human free will.

    Take the example of Jacob and Esau. Scripture tells us God loved Jacob and hated Esau. This does not refer to the human emotions of love and hate. It has to do with God choosing one man and his descendants and rejecting another man and his descendants. God chose Abraham’s son Isaac, and did not choose his son Ishmael. Was this because he foresaw that one would be righteous and the other not? No, it was divine election. One was chosen from the beginning of time to be favored, and the other was not. This drives Arminians crazy, but to me it is clear in the Scriptures.

    “Not only that, but Rebekah’s children had one and the same father, our father Isaac. Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad — in order that God’s purpose in election might stand: not by works but by him who calls — she was told, ‘The older will serve the younger.’ Just as it is written: ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.’”
    Romans 9:10-13

    God’s election is also seen is his choosing Israel of all the nations to be his chosen people. This election was not made on the basis of any kind of merit, either past, present, or foreseen:

    “Know, therefore, that the Lord your God is not giving you this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for you are a stubborn people…….From the day you came out of the land of Egypt until you came to this place, you have been rebellious against the lord. Deut. 9:4-5, 6-7

    While the Pharaoh hardened his heart, if we look closer, we see it was God who brought about the hardening of the pharaoh’s heart. Ex. 4:21

    It is our difficulty in dealing with the problem of sin that causes people to think that God has no sovereignty over sin, and that it was just something introduced by man in the Fall, and all subsequent sin is traceable to human “freewill” choices. But as Robert Peterson puts it in “Why I Am Not An Arminian”:

    “Scripture does not so conveniently absent sin from the sovereignty of God as libertarianism suggests. The ordination of God somehow stands over and guides all events.”

    Who can speak and have it happen if the Lord has not decreed it? Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that both calamities and good things come? Lam 3:37-38

    Adam and Eve were given free choice to choose good or evil. However, after the fall, man has an inclination towards evil that cannot be changed by choice. This bent toward evil imprisons the person and no one can overcome this inclination through the exercise of free will. We are “by nature children of wrath” Eph. 2:3 and “slave to sin” John 8:34. We then try to justify this slavery by calling it “freedom”.

    The will is not made inactive by sin, but becomes bound by sin, until God restores it in an act that is a completely unilateral divine act which is unassisted by us in any way. This is why it is an error to think that God sees our future choices, and then grants or denies salvation based on these foreseen choices. After the fall, we simply cannot choose to be righteous on our own. The only thing God could have foreseen in us is our spiritual death, as none of us is able on our own to trust and obey. God could not foresee a person believing apart from his prior decision to bring that person saving faith.

    “None is rightous, no, not one; no one understands, no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one”. Romans 3:9-12

    Paul’s point in Romans 9 is this:

    14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.

    I welcome your input anytime on these or other issues. Books I can recommend include the following: Our Secure Salvation by Robert Peterson; Election and Free Will, also by Peterson; Love, Freedom, and Evil, by Thaddeus J. Williams.

    In Christ,

  14. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Morning JD:
    Am I reading your article wrong, and your follow up comments?
    For some reason, I get the feeling you don’t subscribe to what I feel is clearly taught in scriptures
    (1 Tim. 2:3-6, KJV) sums it up nicely, and there are numerous scriptures to support it.
    Let me put it this way: I believe the scriptures are clear that when God desires something, He gets what he desires. The word “all” in the above verse, means all, not some, not few…So as you mentioned Judas, I’m happy to anounce he too will be saved in due order, just like ALL the rest of mankind. Firstfruits, first, then…all.
    What say you?
    Take care, God Bless,

  15. Hi Dave. I think we can’t just take the word “all” in isolation, and determine that all means everyone who ever lived or will live. The basic foundation upon which all Christianity rests is the saving act of Christ’s death on the cross. This opened up the possibility of salvation for those who believe in him. The “all” refers to all of those who believe.

    Jesus told his followers that “no one comes to the father except through me.” He also spoke about the narrow gate and the wide gate. So to say everyone is eventually saved would deny these statements. It wouldn’t matter if we chose the wide or narrow gate if we were all headed for salvation in the end. It wouldn’t matter if we believed in Christ or denied him if those without faith could also get to the kingdom of God.

    Hell is a very real place. The bible tells us in clear terms that those whose names are not written in the Lamb’s Book of Life will be cast into the lake of fire which is eternal. What can cause our names to be written in the Book of Life? Repent from sin, and hold to Jesus Christ as your savior.

    See this article from gotquestions.org, a very useful bible study website that holds fast to biblical truth.

    All blessings,

  16. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Hi JD: Sorry to sound argumentative, but IF you’re right, then we worship a saviour that can’t save most of His Father’s creation…A “saviour” that failed His mission, We are also faced with the knowledge that our God has a double standard, in that He commands us to love one another; and worse (for me) to love our enemies – But He will toss 90% of mankind into a hell hole forever, ever and some more? I agree with your point in that Jesus did tell His followers “NO ONE comes to the Father except through (Him DRAGGING) me…” – so much for the altar calls, and the missionaries.
    We don’t chose Him, He CHOOSES US. The point about the wide and narrow gate concerns those called, but the few chosen – here, now – the firstfruits. Your catholic roots are showing JD, and that hellish hell is one of their BIG lies about a truly loving God that sent His Son to do the big job – Adam “succeeded”, Why doubt Jesus? What’s the ‘good news” of a failed saviour? The few get to float around heaven listening to the endless screams of the tormented masses?
    Let me share a site with you brother, PLEASE take a good read on some of the articles and let me know. I didn’t take just one scripture, you”d be surprised how clear the bible really is on the good news of a saviour that actually saves.
    Take care,

  17. Dave, I went to that website, and I read this at the top:

    Christian Hell is a myth……..That is the growing view of Bible scholars, translators and Bible publishers. Hell is leaving the pages of many Bible translations.

    Please Dave, send me some of the names on the “growing list of Bible scholars, translators, and Bible publishers” who view Hell is a myth. And a list of the Bible translations that are now leaving Hell out of their pages. I’m serious. I want to know the names, so that we can view the other work they have done and properly evaluate what their background is. Whatever you can find, even if its only a few. Does this sound fair Dave? Then when we see who is teaching this other than tentmaker.org, we can continue this discussion.

    Because I have heard of ABSOLUTELY NONE that have done so, and I follow this kind of thing very closely. Universalism is heresy Dave. This has always been taught all through the ages, going back to the time of the apostles. Tentmaker is trying to come up with some “new twist” on biblical truth that nobody noticed for 2,000 years, and says we should all believe it because its all the rage now, and everyone who’s anyone in Biblical scholarship is coming to this new realization!

    There was once a wise old man who studied the Bible all his life, who always said: “if its new, it ain’t true.”

    Matt. 18:6 If anyone causes one of these little ones–those who believe in me–to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

    And about Judas, who tentmaker says will be basking in the glory of heaven, how about this verse:

    Matt. 26:24 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.”


  18. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Hello JD:
    From English translations (I like the KJV)
    Hell leaving the bibles: http://www.tentmaker.org/articles/Hell_is_Leaving_the_Bible_Forever.html

    I’m not saying judgement before God won’t be rough – think about the lake of fire (not literal) fire purifies, do you think God was bruttally cruel when after being subjected to YOUR lake of endless fire, He comes along and dumps “Brimstone” in on the tormented victim? Think purification.
    Another question to ask yourself, if forever is a trillion trillion gazillions years, then how many years does adding “and ever” (“forever and ever”) add to forever?
    Here’s a guy I knew until death – we didn’t agree on everything, but he had hellish hell nailed down – Please take a look. http://www.bibletruths.com/
    Take care,

  19. Look Dave. I go to the page you linked. http://www.tentmaker.org/articles/unique_proof_for_universalism.html

    It says “Unique proof for Biblical, Christian universalism.
    I have read this article several times, and it DOES NOT even come close to “proving the truth” of universalism. It is a mish-mash of ideas all jumbled together. The bulk of the article is a very long list of True or False questions. How does a list of True or False questions prove anything?

    If I want to prove something, can I just make a list of True or False questions, and I have proven the point?

    Sorry, Dave, this guy Gary Amirault is twisting scripture beyond recognition.

    Paul said, “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6.9-10)

    I guess we have to get all the bible publishers to toss these verses out next printing, as well:

    “Do not fear them who can kill the body only rather fear Him who can destroy both the soul and body in hell” Matt. 10.28

    “He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone” Rev.(14.10), and “they have no rest day nor night” (v.11), for it “will never burn out” Matt. 25:41

    They “will never die, and the fire that burns them will never go out” (Is. 66.24).

    I think I’ll give you one last chance to give me a convincing, biblically sound argument that hell doesn’t exist, and at the same time also explains all the verses that clearly say it does, and then I’ll have to close this discussion down, Dave. Sorry, but I never meant this site to be a forum for people to deny fundamental, apostle-taught principles that make up the foundation of the Christian faith.


  20. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Greetings JD
    I never meant to turn your blog into a forum.
    I was commenting on your rather passionate article that God doesn’t visit hap hazard judgement via natural disasters on evil while sparring “good”. I AGREE, I’m just wondering why you believe in an ogre god who punishes His creation for eternity – What would you think of an earthly parent who punished their child for 18 yrs? And your god goes off “forever and ever” – Seriously, punishment or TORTURE?
    You quote Paul in 1 Cor. 6, why not Paul in Rom. 3:10 – “10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:”? Looks like hell will be crowded.? Or, are we missing something here? I say we are, for the only “righteousness” that count’s is God’s, and what He imparts to the “new man” in Christ – Yes, Jesus did accomplish a lot.
    Look at this JD – Romans 6:23 “For the wages of sin is DEATH…” NOT eternal torture. Jesus death conquered DEATH – and “Hell” is the GRAVE. There is no “hell” in Greek and the KJV NT was translated from the Greek. Ditto for the OT Hebrew. I appreciate the opportunity to “convince” you, but it won’t happen.
    Did you read this, NOT from tentmakers?
    I would appreciate it if you did, and then closed this thread with your final post declaring, “Yes Dave, I believe the guy who spent 23 min in Hell for that’s the way it is…”
    Take care JD
    Your friend,

  21. The poor souls of people who hate God (and there are many, many, of those around.) According to universalism they will be dragged by God kicking and screaming into the Kingdom to spend all time with the one they hate!

    And yes, hell will have many souls. Jesus wasn’t playing word games when he said the way is narrow that leads to the kingdom. There will be great multitudes who will be saved, but by no means does this take on your interpretation of “all” being saved. I rest in the security of knowing Christ died so that I don’t have to take the wide gate if I don’t want to.

    And what is this monstrous, extravagant price God demands from me in return to regain the gift of eternal life lost in the Garden? To repent for my sin, and accept his son. I gladly accept those terms. Those who refuse this generous gift, like the people you are holding up as master theologians, will pay a huge price.


  22. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Goodmorning JD:
    Since I see you no longer sign with “Blessings” your responses to me, this will be the last time I bother you, for I mean no offense, and I’m not out to win a debate with you.
    Yes JD, the ‘poor people who hate God” AND the poor people who never knew God or Jesus Christ.
    You know, “The only name under heaven…”
    True http://bible-truths.com/23-minutes-in-hell.html is a long read, but are you sure you don’t want to read it – IMO it does a nice job of answering your objections.
    Take care,
    Your friend,

  23. Dave: I read every article at every link you sent. The bible-truths links I read many times. I tried to see if they conformed to scripture, and found them wanting. I also researched Gary Amirault and L. Ray Smith. My conclusions? That these are people who twist scripture to make it mean what they want it to mean.

    All of the Bible versions they quote as having removed all references to hell are plainly bogus versions. The Hastings Dictionary of the New Testament? What is that?

    Here is a link to an article showing the many ways L. Ray Smith denied basic biblical truths, even denying the Trinity. Dave, I can’t put it in any nicer terms than this: denying the Trinity is a work of the devil.


    Even you said you disagree with him on many things. You can’t just read a body of work and cherry-pick the things you feel comfortable with, and reject anything that gives you an unsettled feeling. And you can’t do that with the Bible, either, as these men you referenced do.

    The man (L. Ray Smith) was beyond any shadow of a doubt a heretic, but you feel comfortable picking one of his teachings and passing that on to others. This can be very harmful to others in the church. This is why I need to speak out, sometimes harshly, when I hear doctrine that denies biblical truth. This is a discernment site. In reply after reply that I gave you I was trying to show you with biblical passages and verses, that what they teach was in serious error, and you would just come back with new comments which contained more and more links but without comment on the verses I gave you to consider.

    If we all are eventually saved, why did Jesus tell us so many times to be ready? There would be no particular need to be ready for his coming, or our death, if we were all going to get endless second chances in the afterlife. In the parable of the virgins who were not ready with oil in their lamps for the return of the bridegroom, they were excluded from the marriage feast. They were not invited in later. I don’t know what this parable means to you Dave, but it tells me to be ready at all times, for we know not the hour of his coming (or our death.) Another parable teaching the same principle is the one about the servant who was not ready for his master’s return.

    And when he comes, (or we die) and we are not ready, we are excluded. These parables would have no meaning whatsoever if it meant we were just cut off for a while, but then invited in later. The parables would teach that the banishment or exclusion was only temporary, and later was lifted. But they don’t say that.

    I’m sorry if anything I said offended you, but this is what I do: I defend biblical truth. Anything that strays from biblical truth, I strongly reject in strong terms, and if people end up offended, so be it. I guess the bottom line for me is I would rather risk offending someone than giving approval through my silence of doctrines that say we’re all going to be given as many second chances as necessary to come to the Lord after death. Can you imagine the burden of having taught someone a doctrine that claims they don’t necessarily need to repent now because they can do all that in the afterlife, and then that person dies in their sin?

    Matt. 18:6-7 6 but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 “Woe to the world because of its stumbling blocks! For it is inevitable that stumbling blocks come; but woe to that man through whom the stumbling block comes!

    I say this not to lift myself up but I honestly think you could benefit from studying the practice of biblical hermeneutics. This will show you how things can never be taken out of context when reading the bible. Also, that God’s word to us was designed to be full and complete, and to reject even the smallest part of the bible, is to reject the whole thing, because it is saying God was wrong on a certain point, but he is to be believed on other points.

    My prayer is that you come to believe in God’s word as full and complete as it is now, and that nothing should be excluded, as L. Ray Smith and Gary Amirault claim. It is truly a wonderful guide book for our lives, and lays out completely the way to salvation. We don’t need to rely on what any man claims scripture says, in fact doing so can be dangerous, as we see with the writings of people like that.

    As always, my prayers are with you.

    In Christ,
    JD Ellis

  24. Actually this is the first time I have had someone come on here and challenge the foundational beliefs of Christianity with ideas like the denial of the Trinity, the belief that all religions lead to the Kingdom of God, that it doesn’t matter if you believe in Christ or Mohammed, we’re all going to meet up merrily in heaven. I think its a sign of the growing level of apostasy which was foretold in the New Testament that these doctrines are now becoming so accepted.

    Universalism taught by men like these is just a modern-day version of what Satan did in the Garden. Just as he whispered to Eve that “you will surely not die”, today he whispers in our ear: “don’t believe that Bible of yours. It was translated by men, who didn’t do a good job of translation. Just remove what you don’t like, and add your own views. There surely is no hell.”

    A sermon I can recommend that will clearly explain the errors one falls into when embracing the false doctrine of universalism is the following: Please give it a listen.


    May God be with you,

    JD Ellis

  25. Dave Corum, ND says:

    Morning JD:
    I object to “churchanity”. The rule of man vs the rule of God – God created by man in man’s image, vs man created by God in His image. The Catholic/Protestant silly notion of a God created Satan who is at war with God for the salvation of lost souls is pure nonsense. Seriously, Satan “wins” by a 90% margin because man can’t or won’t come to Jesus? Man is in charge of his salvation? You mix a lot of issues here JD. The “Kingdom of God” pertains to Jesus and His elect – aka: “Firstfruits” and has nothing to do with the general ressurection of the remaining masses, who are asleep in the graves, knowing nothing, neither in heaven or a hellish hell, awaiting ressurection unto judgement and purification. Simple huh? And yes, scriptural, for God’s will will be done and who can stop it? His created Satan? Ignorant man?
    You bally hoo the vaunted “Trinity” doctrine, can’t even find the word “Trinity” in scriptures, so again man limits God to 3? Well what about Paul?
    Without exception, in all his letters, Paul’s greetings are the same – Take Romans for example:
    “7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.”
    WHERE’S THE THIRD GUY??? No mention of the “Holy Ghost”? No greeting, yet to blaspheme the “Holy Ghost” is unpardonable and will land yer butt in hellfire forever and ever???
    I dispensed with the hellish hell 20yrs plus ago before stumbling on Ray Smith’s site. I only introduced him to you because it was another sourse other than tentmakers, and one of the best exposures of the hellish hell nonsense. Along with a great take down of that best selling fiction: “23 minutes in hell”.
    If you were to print out the article, it would be 153 pages – I can’t in my heart believe you read it.
    JD, friend, you might be suffering from a condition we all have had at one time or another: “Cognitive Dissonance”
    There is a cure you know?
    Take care,
    Your friend,
    Please read it all

  26. I didn’t say I “printed out” all 153 pages, I said I read it. Don’t believe me if you wish. You just can’t accept that any thinking person would reject these weak extra-biblical arguments.

    The argument that the bible doesn’t tell us of the Trinity “because the word ‘trinity’ is not used” is typical of the silly word games you people play. Honestly, I wonder if you’ve ever read the bible if you think there’s no mention of the Holy Spirit. What were those tongues of fire that descended on the day of Pentecost? We don’t receive the Holy Spirit, even though Jesus said specifically he left us with the Holy Spirit?

    And I guess I have to accept your notion that Satan was never “at war” with God. Satan has surely lost, but to say there was never a war? If you don’t think there is a war going on daily for our souls you really underestimate the power of the evil forces in the world today. Satan is constantly at war, trying to undermine the authority of Scripture. Just look at the victories he has won in convincing you and those you follow that there is no hell, and no Trinity, and that we should edit out any references to these things.

    I guess Satan wasn’t really trying to tempt Jesus in the desert or on top of the temple, was he? They were just pals having a good ole’ time, planning to meet up later in heaven, right chum? Or maybe you don’t think Jesus is God? Sorry if that’s putting words in your mouth, but you’ve already said there is no Trinity, so I thought maybe that’s what I’m going to hear next.

    In a previous comment, you quote 1Tim. 2:3-6,

    3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all people.

    This is your proof text to show all people will be saved? You once again fail to see that ALL is clearly not used to mean every single person. The word “all” you insist on taking literally, even though it is used frequently in scripture in a figurative sense.

    2 Chron 35:18

    Josiah, with the priests, the Levites and all Judah and Israel who were there with the people of Jerusalem…..

    What? You mean the bible is saying here that every man, woman, and child of all the territories of Judah and Israel was in Jerusalem?

    Matthew Henry’s commentary explains 1Tim.2:3-6:

    This one God will have all men to be saved; he desires not the death and destruction of any (Ezek. 33:11), but the welfare and salvation of all. Not that he has decreed the salvation of all, for then all men would be saved; but he has a good will to the salvation of all, and none perish but by their own fault, Matt. 23:37.

    God never called everyone to be saints. God chose his elect from the beginning of time. He chose SOME, not ALL. It drives people like you crazy to think that a just God could choose only some, and not everyone. Why would there even need to be a thing called “election” if there was nobody to elect because ALL were chosen? The word election means choosing some out of many.

    The universalists try to ignore passages like Romans 9:

    11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

    12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.

    13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

    14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

    15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

    Let me ask: when one takes a spouse in marriage, is he then required to love everyone in the world with the same love he has for his spouse? Would God not have the same right to love some with a different love than others of his creation? Is the potter not sovereign over the clay, to mold as he wishes?

    The way you lump Catholics together with Protestants is very telling as well. There is just a diametrical difference in the two. You are truly blind if you lump these two disparate groups together. The Roman church is the spirit of antichrist, while the latter fought against everything the Roman church stood for during the Protestant Reformation. The Roman church burned at the stake the true saints of Christ’s church all through the Middle Ages. It certainly wouldn’t hurt your cause if you took the time to learn a little history.

    Its ironic as well that your belief that after death there is a punishment, or “refining” done somewhere for a period of time, and then the person goes to heaven. That is “purgatory” – the distinctly Catholic doctrine that I stopped believing in right after the Catholic nuns taught about it when I was in elementary school!!! It seems you have more in common with our Catholic friends than you care to admit.

    So you are anti-church? Gee, I wonder why that doesn’t surprise me. Yet another area where you have better ideas than Christ and the Word of God. What was Jesus thinking, starting a church??? (sarcasm intended.)

    I see now that you just stumbled onto my site because you agreed with an article I wrote about judgment. You didn’t even get that article right. i wasn’t saying God doesn’t judge, I was writing about how we can’t claim that every disaster is specifically judgment against the nation where it occurs. Don’t tell me, let me guess. You don’t believe God judges, do you?

    Dave, you have clearly come to the wrong website. But I can recommend a site that has a forum you will really enjoy. Your ideas will be welcomed with open arms here:

    Here you will find lots of people who agree with your ideas that God is almost entirely love, and rarely shows any signs of his other attributes, such as infinite justice, and wrath. And that we’ll all be rubbing shoulders with Stalin, Hitler, and Lucifer in the glory of heaven.

    I also have a book recommendation for you:
    “Love Wins” by Rob Bell. You’ll love Bell’s New Age, “lovey-dovey”, “make love, not war” “you’re OK, I’m OK” hippie-style take on God. Its so quaint. Reminds me of the old sixties tune, ♪ “Michael row the boat ashore, halelulia.” ♪

    Thanks for your dignosis of my condition. There’s a cure for your condition as well: Its called “sola scriptura”, the unflinching belief that the Bible which was written down by the apostles and handed down to us over the centuries is indeed the inspired word of God, and contains all we need unto salvation. Yes, that would include the King James Version, with all its numerous, undiscountable references to a hellish hell, and NO, we are not called by God to edit out these, or any other references. In fact, we are clearly warned against doing so.

    And also, because you seem to think I am in some kind of agreement with “23 minutes in Hell”, I think that book is trash. Read my take on false prophet Maurice Sklar, for presuming we can get “glimpses” of heaven or hell. Its people like Bill Wiese that damage the church by giving fuel to the fire of people that run to the other extreme and end up denying everything Christ taught, like the danger of dying in sin, and the Holy Spirit.

    Christ never died on the cross so that those who believe in Mohammed or Krishna will be saved. To believe we can make our saving decision in the afterlife is to make a sham of the physical death of Christ in this world. His body was nailed on the cross in this world so that those in this world might come to believe in him as the only way to heaven. It was not done to change someone’s mind in the afterlife. The bible teaches salvation by faith through grace. Universalists believe its by grace only, and conveniently do away with the “faith” part, because all the numerous passages about the need to believe Jesus is the Messiah don’t fit their aganda.

    If universalists were allowed to edit the Bible, there would be nothing left in. All Genesis would have to go, because the “all-love” God wouldn’t destroy everyone in the world except for eight people. Then Exodus would have to go, because the “all-love” God isn’t found there, either. One by one, every book in scripture would need heavy editing or outright removal.

    When Christ commanded: “go and make disciples of all nations” I suppose he didn’t really have any sense of urgency in saying this, because he knew all along that everyone would be saved even if the apostles didn’t reach them with the message of the gospel. In fact, I guess he knew the message of the gospel wasn’t an urgent message at all, and didn’t need to be spread to all nations. He must have misspoken. According to universalists, what he really meant was, “but if you don’t, that’s OK, the Father will convince them all eventually in the afterlife, so don’t sweat it if you don’t reach all nations.”

    I will not stop praying that the Holy Spirit will one day open your eyes. But I guess if you don’t believe he exists, that may not happen.

    JD Ellis

  27. Guy says:

    I’m assuming I was meant to come across this exchange at nearly midnight (UK) and feel I should add my comment.

    I was excommunicated from the fellowship I was brought up in, for claiming the Oneness of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit being manifestations, not ‘persons’ as Trinitarians claim. I am absolutely 100% convicted I was given to understand the way our Almighty Creator was pleased to be revealed – in Son, as the Believer’s Father and as an indwelling Spirit. We cannot assume form the incarnation that the man Christ Jesus was anyone other than that Same Creator God.

    Anyway, just to state, it has been said before, but God doesn’t want persons in eternal torment, but they will end up there through unbelief. Dave Corum conveniently ignores the sinner’s responsibility to respond to the Gospel. Hell is eternal, as will be Heaven!

  28. Thanks for the comments Guy. Dave Corum doesn’t even believe in Hell, and also denies the trinity, so he’s not a Christian. That’s why I reacted so strongly, because he came onto this blog as if he was an inquiring Christian, seeking knowledge and looking to perhaps engage in Christian discussion, and then he drops a few bombs of apostasy and I realize he’s a complete apostate trying to mold Christianity into a thing of his making.

    The Trinity is such an issue that involves a great deal of explanation and exegesis. In the small space I have here, I can best just recommend a book to you. It is called “The Forgotten Trinity” by Dr. James White. In here you have the complete story of what the church has taught down through the ages about the Trinity, but has been regrettably forgotten by recent generations.

    God bless you,
    JD Ellis

  29. Guy says:

    Yes, I cottoned on quickly, as you did. Every blessing gracious brother in the Lord. I know I do not yet know everything as I ought to know it (1 Corinthians 13:12) and thank you for the recommended reading.

  30. Pingback: End Times Prophecy Headlines: May 16, 2014 | End Times Prophecy Report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s