The Cambridge Declaration – Why Every Ministry Should Implement It

In response to the mass abandonment of Christ-centered apologetics in the church in modern times, the Cambridge Declaration was issued in 1996 by the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals. It was a direct response to the declining state of the Evangelical movement in America.

The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals came to be formed a year after David F. Wells authored a book called No Place for Truth or Whatever Happened to Evangelical Theology? in 1993. The book was critically acclaimed by a number of important Evangelical leaders. In 1994 a number of these leaders came together at a conference in Cambridge, Massachusetts out of which the Cambridge Declaration was issued.

Two of the principle players involved were James Montgomery Boice and Michael S. Horton.  The list of those gathered included some notable Evangelical leaders: R.C. Sproul, John MacArthur, John Piper, Albert Mohler, Alistair Begg, and many others. The reasons for issuing the Declaration were the following: (ref. Wikipedia – Cambridge Declaration)

  • The culture of the modern world (as represented by Postmodernism) is changing the message that the church preaches.
  • The erosion of Christian doctrine within the modern church, including the lack of Expository Preaching.
  • The increasing influence of Relativism within the church, which has led to an environment where “truth” is subjectively determined, and where church leaders aim to preach only “positive” messages.
  • The increasing focus upon man, rather than God, within the church.
  • An increasing focus on man’s ability to respond to God’s grace, rather than a focus upon God’s ability to save man.
  • A focus on the quantitative and measurable aspects of church growth (which thus links Christian ministry with outward success) rather than the qualitative and spiritual aspects of Biblical ministry.

In a call for a return to historical Evangelicalism, and the truths once proclaimed at the time of the Protestant Reformation, the Cambridge Delaration focused on the five solas which articulate historic Christian truth:

Sola Scriptura: The Erosion of Authority


……………….Scripture alone is the inerrant rule of the church’s life, but the evangelical church today has separated Scripture from its authoritative function. In practice, the church is guided, far too often, by the culture. Therapeutic technique, marketing strategies, and the beat of the entertainment world often have far more to say about what the church wants, how it functions and what it offers, than does the Word of God.

…………………Scripture must take us beyond our perceived needs to our real needs and liberate us from seeing ourselves through the seductive images, cliches, promises and priorities of mass culture. It is only in the light of God’s truth that we understand ourselves aright and see God’s provision for our need. The Bible, therefore, must be taught and preached in the church. Sermons must be expositions of the Bible and its teachings, not expressions of the preacher’s opinions or the ideas of the age. We must settle for nothing less than what God has given.

……………………The work of the Holy Spirit in personal experience cannot be disengaged from Scripture. The Spirit does not speak in ways that are independent of Scripture. Apart from Scripture we would never have known of God’s grace in Christ. The biblical Word, rather than spiritual experience, is the test of truth.

Thesis One: Sola Scriptura

We reaffirm the inerrant Scripture to be the sole source of written divine revelation, which alone can bind the conscience. The Bible alone teaches all that is necessary for our salvation from sin and is the standard by which all Christian behavior must be measured.

We deny that any creed, council or individual may bind a Christian’s conscience, that the Holy Spirit speaks independently of or contrary to what is set forth in the Bible, or that personal spiritual experience can ever be a vehicle of revelation.

Note the key part of this provision: that the Holy Spirit does not speak in ways that are independent of scripture. How clearly we see these kinds of errors in so many churches today, and even more so in the numerous internet ministries which have sprouted up. How quickly could we all see through the fear-mongering false prophets of the internet with this understanding. All the blather spouted by the likes of the internet fear mongers about the Holy Spirit coming to their “specially annointed” prophetic ministries, and passing on information completely outside the realm of what God has revealed to us in scripture, would be exposed for what it is.

No more would we have to see many of our brothers and sisters in Christ get caught up in the snares and traps set by those who would have us believe they receive extra-biblical revelation in their dreams and visions. No more would we be held captive to the daily and weekly broadcasts telling us how much we need to listen to their pronouncements to find out those things God supposedly wants us to know, but somehow left out of his holy scriptures. We would stand as one and renounce the ministers who call themselves Christian, and speak what they tell us is “new revelation.”

Anyone who tells you he had a personal experience that God gave him in order for you to receive revelation or knowledge can be discounted as false and against what the Bible teaches. Following this thesis of the Declaration would give a big “thumbs up” to God’s revelation in the scriptures, and a resounding “thumbs down” to the masquerade of human revelation.  It could shut down the heretical dream and vision ministers overnight, and lead them to earn an honest, biblically-based living, refocusing on Christ, and turning the spotlight away from themselves and their relentless pursuit of sensationalism.

Solus Christus: The Erosion of Christ-Centered Faith


……………As evangelical faith becomes secularized, its interests have been blurred with those of the culture. The result is a loss of absolute values, permissive individualism, and a substitution of wholeness for holiness, recovery for repentance, intuition for truth, feeling for belief, chance for providence, and immediate gratification for enduring hope.

Thesis Two: Solus Christus

We reaffirm that our salvation is accomplished by the mediatorial work of the historical Christ alone. His sinless life and substitutionary atonement alone are sufficient for our justification and reconciliation to the Father.

We deny that the gospel is preached if Christ’s substitutionary work is not declared and faith in Christ and his work is not solicited.

Here we see the issue of calling for people to “make a decision” to be saved, without any preaching of the gospel. Often this calling comes after a presentation of some sorts which appeals heavily to the emotions, but says little or nothing about the gospel and does not preach the Atonement. How many ministers talk at length about the doom and calamity to come, inflaming our emotions and fears, without actually saying a word about the gospel? With this filter in place, we can know right away when we are hearing the gospel of man being preached. It is faith in Christ and his work that a true minister will preach, not how to prepare for the next disaster, or worse, attempting to pass on to us on behalf of God the details about where or how that disaster will strike.

Next time any of us are tempted to think of people like the doomsayers of the internet as ministers of the Christian faith, we need pause to reflect whether they are preaching the gospel, or merely whipping up an emotional stir in us. The emotions are a very unreliable guide as to whether we are hearing truth. The wildly emotional rantings of the false teachers are very foreign to how the Holy Spirit actually works in our lives.  

This is also relevant to the emotional displays often put forward by neo-Pentecostal preachers and churches, where a fevor pitch is incited, and the implication is made that this indicates the presence of the Spirit. Tongues speaking and prophecy are then given high credentials as people are swept up in the frenzy, convinced that their state of delirium confirms the action of the Spirit.

Sola Gratia: The Erosion of the Gospel


…………….Unwarranted confidence in human ability is a product of fallen human nature. This false confidence now fills the evangelical world; from the self-esteem gospel, to the health and wealth gospel, from those who have transformed the gospel into a product to be sold and sinners into consumers who want to buy, to others who treat Christian faith as being true simply because it works. This silences the doctrine of justification regardless of the official commitments of our churches.

………………..God’s grace in Christ is not merely necessary but is the sole efficient cause of salvation. We confess that human beings are born spiritually dead and are incapable even of cooperating with regenerating grace.

Thesis Three: Sola Gratia

We reaffirm that in salvation we are rescued from God’s wrath by his grace alone. It is the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit that brings us to Christ by releasing us from our bondage to sin and raising us from spiritual death to spiritual life.

We deny that salvation is in any sense a human work. Human methods, techniques or strategies by themselves cannot accomplish this transformation. Faith is not produced by our unregenerated human nature.

In this statement we see that no manner of human manipulative technique can lead anyone to faith, as these techniques are from unregenerated man. Again, as in the examples of Charismatic and Pentecostal churches, and the wild, flamboyant internet ministries of the Rick Wiles-Nathan Leal-Steve Quayle paradigm, we observe that the Holy Spirit simply cannot be summoned through controversy or sensationalism. No amount of internet marketing and grandstanding can lead anyone to salvation.

So many ministries today treat faith as a commodity to be promoted, marketed, and sold. We have all listened to these hour long internet broadcasts which focus on everything from how evil the secular government is, to the latest government conspiracy, and if we just send in our donations, they will be able to continue to channel this badly-needed information to Christians everywhere. When not one word of the gospel has been preached, can we still call this a “Christian” broadcast or ministry? 

 Sola Fide: The Erosion of the Chief Article


………….Justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. This is the article by which the church stands or falls. Today this article is often ignored, distorted or sometimes even denied by leaders, scholars and pastors who claim to be evangelical.

……………Many in the church growth movement believe that sociological understanding of those in the pew is as important to the success of the gospel as is the biblical truth which is proclaimed. As a result, theological convictions are frequently divorced from the work of the ministry. The marketing orientation in many churches takes this even further, erasing the distinction between the biblical Word and the world, robbing Christ’s cross of its offense, and reducing Christian faith to the principles and methods which bring success to secular corporations.

………………There is no basis for our acceptance before God except in Christ’s saving work, not in our patriotism, churchly devotion or moral decency. The gospel declares what God has done for us in Christ. It is not about what we can do to reach him.

Thesis Four: Sola Fide

We reaffirm that justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. In justification Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us as the only possible satisfaction of God’s perfect justice.

We deny that justification rests on any merit to be found in us, or upon the grounds of an infusion of Christ’s righteousness in us, or that an institution claiming to be a church that denies or condemns sola fide can be recognized as a legitimate church.

Teaching that the gospel is about our moral decency “as a nation”, or our “patriotism” is a perversion of the true gospel. Speculations about presumed future judgments from God upon the nation is not preaching the gospel. A great deal of what we hear on the average Christian internet broadcast falls under this category – little more than a conspiracy-laced brand of neo-patriotism masked as modern day Christianity.

The righteousness imputed to us is what justifies, not the feeble human attempts to gain some appearance of righteous behavior by political moralizing or attempting to reach a Christian moral high ground through condemnation of our political leaders or systems. How many of the internet preacher/gurus today try to turn this government-baiting into their own form of religion?

Soli Deo Gloria: The Erosion of God-Centered Worship


………………Wherever in the church biblical authority has been lost, Christ has been displaced, the gospel has been distorted, or faith has been perverted, it has always been for one reason: our interests have displaced God’s and we are doing his work in our way. The loss of God’s centrality in the life of today’s church is common and lamentable. It is this loss that allows us to transform worship into entertainment, gospel preaching into marketing, believing into technique, being good into feeling good about ourselves, and faithfulness into being successful. As a result, God, Christ and the Bible have come to mean too little to us and rest too inconsequentially upon us.

……………….God does not exist to satisfy human ambitions, cravings, the appetite for consumption, or our own private spiritual interests. We must focus on God in our worship, rather than the satisfaction of our personal needs. God is sovereign in worship; we are not. Our concern must be for God’s kingdom, not our own empires, popularity or success.

Thesis Five: Soli Deo Gloria

We reaffirm that because salvation is of God and has been accomplished by God, it is for God’s glory and that we must glorify him always. We must live our entire lives before the face of God, under the authority of God and for his glory alone.

We deny that we can properly glorify God if our worship is confused with entertainment, if we neglect either Law or Gospel in our preaching, or if self-improvement, self-esteem or self-fulfillment are allowed to become alternatives to the gospel.

If a ministry is centered around its own success, popularity, and fulfillment, and teaching these things to others, then God’s interests are being displaced by our own worldly ambitions. The false preachers are always exhorting their listeners to help them expand their empires, and this is said to be “for the Kingdom.” But can we afford to blur the distinction between true gospel preaching and what amounts to little more than self-promotion and marketing techniques?

I recall not long ago one of the internet ministers insisted that the Kingdom of God would be greatly glorified and expanded if his listeners would send him financial support so that he could build a “state of the art 24-hour Christian broadcasting network.” Here we see his own spiritual interests expressed in the human appetite for personal consumption and cravings to satisfy human ambition, replacing God’s interests. We must not try to do God’s work our own way. We must not allow worship to be transformed into entertainment, and preaching into marketing. We cannot build secular kingdoms that have any lasting impact because they are built on worldly ambition.

We will end with the closing comments of the Cambridge Declaration, which powerfully sum up the call for a return to historical evangelicalism. Since the church has travelled even further adrift in the time since the passing of this declaration in 1996, all concerned ministers should have a serious look at implementing the provisions contained herein.

A Call To Repentance and Reformation

The faithfulness of the evangelical church in the past contrasts sharply with its unfaithfulness in the present. Earlier in this century, evangelical churches sustained a remarkable missionary endeavor, and built many religious institutions to serve the cause of biblical truth and Christ’s kingdom. That was a time when Christian behavior and expectations were markedly different from those in the culture. Today they often are not. The evangelical world today is losing its biblical fidelity, moral compass and missionary zeal.

We repent of our worldliness. We have been influenced by the “gospels” of our secular culture, which are no gospels. We have weakened the church by our own lack of serious repentance, our blindness to the sins in ourselves which we see so clearly in others, and our inexcusable failure to adequately tell others about God’s saving work in Jesus Christ.

We also earnestly call back erring professing evangelicals who have deviated from God’s Word in the matters discussed in this Declaration. This includes those who declare that there is hope of eternal life apart from explicit faith in Jesus Christ, who claim that those who reject Christ in this life will be annihilated rather than endure the just judgment of God through eternal suffering, or who claim that evangelicals and Roman Catholics are one in Jesus Christ even where the biblical doctrine of justification is not believed.

The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals asks all Christians to give consideration to implementing this Declaration in the church’s worship, ministry, policies, life and evangelism.

For Christ’s sake. Amen.

The Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals Executive Council (1996):

Dr. John Armstrong
The Rev. Alistair Begg
Dr. James M. Boice
Dr. W. Robert Godfrey
Dr. John D. Hannah
Dr. Michael S. Horton
Mrs. Rosemary Jensen
Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.
Dr. Robert M. Norris
Dr. R.C. Sproul
Dr. Gene Edward Veith
Dr. David Wells
Dr. Luder Whitlock
Dr. J.A.O. Preus, III

All blessings in Christ

JD Ellis

This entry was posted in Doctrinal Issues. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to The Cambridge Declaration – Why Every Ministry Should Implement It

  1. Gospel Gertie says:

    This is nothing more than a Calvinist manifesto which promotes the false gospel that perverts God’s Word and the true meaning of predestination. It negates the fact that each person has the choice whether to respond to the drawing and conviction of the Holy Spirit by denying that man has any free will whatsoever. The denial of Calvinism does not automatically define one as being Armininian which is also a pitfall. Unless a ministry subscribes to TULIP which describes a “god” who has no love for mankind in general and did not pay the penalty for all would consider this a viable and biblical declaration. This neither defines those who oppose Calvinism but believe in “free grace”.

    • Justification is by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. According to its adherence to this, a church will stand or fall.

      Human nature, because it is fallen, abhors the whole idea that Christ’s imputed righteousness is needed. We want desperately to think we are in charge of our own salvation, and we imagine that we gradually make our own way down the salvation pathway through our own efforts and a series of “free will choices.” That is impossible. The human is fallen, and left to his own wits and devices, will never navigate his way to salvation. Our salvation comes solely upon what Christ has done for us, not what we have done for God.

      Romans 3
      10 as it is written:

      “None is righteous, no, not one;
      11 no one understands;
      no one seeks for God.
      12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
      no one does good,
      not even one.”
      13 “Their throat is an open grave;
      they use their tongues to deceive.”
      “The venom of asps is under their lips.”
      14 “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.”
      15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood;
      16 in their paths are ruin and misery,
      17 and the way of peace they have not known.”
      18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

      19 Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. 20 For by works of the law no human being will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.

      Justification By Faith
      21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.

      Blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  2. brian says:

    Very crafty declaration. They should not complain when the media lumps them in with Westboro Babtist as they use the same tactics.

    • Thanks Brian for another confirmation that this Declaration is so badly needed today.

      For those who don’t know, the Westboro Baptist folks are the ones who make the news by disrupting the funerals of prominent homosexuals by screaming out hateful, derogatory names and calling hellfire down upon the deceased.

      For a person to draw a parallel from the tactics they use to this Declaration to return to historical Evangelicalism pretty well proves how far we have strayed from adhering to Biblical truth.

      People so desperately want God to conform to their wishes of what he is like. Anyone who dares to point out that we must follow all of the scriptures in learning of his attributes is likened to a Westboro Baptist. Brian, as much as you earnestly desire God to be a roly-poly Santa Claus figure, who acts as a rich, permissive Dad with a huge open wallet, we must look at all his attributes. These include infinite justice, wrath, and all those things many don’t want to hear about.

      Salvation is of the Lord, not of our actions. Nothing we can do will justify us in the eyes of God. It was done for us on the cross. We receive it by imputation from the Lord through faith.

      All blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  3. Anne says:

    How is Beatriz…should I post a blog and put up your family photos?
    Along with your address. Cowards will not enter heaven.

    • Thanks Anne, and M.A. for showing all the world what spiritual fibre you folks are made of. Keeping it classy as always.

      For the benefit of my readers, I have recently had Nathan Leal and several of his supporters attempting to gather information on my friends and family on Facebook, and others who they think are my family, even though I don’t use Facebook. He and some of the ardent, strident supporters of his Watchmans Cry site have been trying to use Facebook as a new front in attempts to discredit what I write about, because they know they don’t have scripture to back up what they do.

      Well, I guess we can’t expect any less from this “watchman” bunch. If you can’t show how the scripture supports what you are doing in your ministry, then what else is a person to do but start up the personal attacks?

      You will recognize some of the names from their past vitriolic comments here: Anne and M.A. And Nathan Leal himself recently tried to sneak onto a friend’s Facebook page, representing himself as a friend of mine to get information concerning some photographs of my family that had been posted there. (What is that called – tagging or befriending??) Nice, Nathan. Show everyone how you emulate Christ. You guys sure run a classy outfit over there at Watchmans Cry.

      Apparently Nathan Leal is too cowardly to debate me on scripture, and prefers to use underhanded personal attacks and attempts to snoop on my private life. The Watchman should take a page from his forum member tsimitpo’s book, who while many times disagreeing with me, at least tries in his own way to keep it scriptural for the most part. He is the only one I know of from that time-worn, resurrected, and resuscitated forum Watchmans Cry who has any class at all.

      To Nathan Leal, and the others, if you’re right, scripture will bear you out. Use scripture as your defense to anything I write. Debate me, don’t be low-life cowards by trying to attack my family to hide your real intentions.

      There will be a huge price to pay for every Christian leader who leads a single one of God’s chosen away from scripture onto the dreams of men. Nathan, you’ve got much bigger, eternal issues to worry about than anything that’s on Facebook. Even if you think you will meet success in your Facebook espionage, I will only take that as confirmation from God that I should continue the struggle against sites like yours with a redoubled effort.

      As far as those photos you threaten to post, Anne, I’m not sure what you’re referring to but apparently you think that some kind of veiled threat concerning Facebook is going to make me hide in the bushes somewhere. Post to your heart’s content. Everything you do will further demonstrate what I have said all along. These “ministers of the internet” are a farce and a sham, who are willing to use any tactics, except using scripture, to try and win more converts to their cau$e.

      And you, Anne, smugly sit at your computer threatening to post photos and my address, which you think you have acquired by snooping on Facebook along with your fellow snoop, the self-styled “Christian minister” Nathan Leal, while at the same time you deign to call me a coward? God will judge who are the ones being cowardly here.

      Some days people make this job so easy. Issuing threats about some Facebook issue when I’m not even on Facebook?? What category of Christianity would you put that in?

      JD Ellis

  4. Steven says:

    The Church in America lost it’s focus long ago. Though this declaration is badly needed few ministries would ever adopt it. The Church is splintered into a thousand or more different cliques. I see Alistair Begg’s name on the list. I highly respect him for his adherence to Biblical doctrine and recommended him as an addition to the BBN Radio Network several years ago. However after his program was put on it was shortly taken off simply due to a personal dislike by the BBN dictator in chief. He had previously removed John MacArthur’s radio ministry. Though BBN refuses to participate in the contemporary Christian movement in any of it’s deceptive aspects it is a sad day when a supposedly Biblical network removes ministries so highly needed at this time.

    The internet along with a declining America has bred a new clique in the Church. I call it the gospel of Preparedness that so many Christian patriots preach. Nobody is better at it than Steve Quayle. Though being prepared for hard times is justified these people like other cliques go off on an extreme tangent, even making a business out of it. The gospel of Jesus Christ has been morphed into a humanistic emotional tool for “taking back America.” Real conspiracies are destroying America but like you said much of what we hear from self made “ministries” is nothing more than, “neo-patriotism masked as modern day Christianity.” The number one priority of Christians should be to advance the gospel message. Everything else should be secondary and balanced, not going to this extreme of that. And that includes doing absolutely nothing in the face of advancing government tyranny which some Christians advocate. America is where it is now because that is exactly what the Church has been doing for decades. Christians are supposed to be salt and light in whatever culture they are in. Nevertheless America is not our home. Heaven is. If only Christians would live like that is true, especially those in ministries, who bear a greater responsibility.

    • Thanks Steven. You very well summarized the state of Christianity today. It has to a great extent lost its focus on the gospel and Christ to become a me-centered doctrinal mish-mash of survival preparedness, anti-government scare tactics, and false prophecy. This is fed to the Christian masses like an opiate, and they keep coming back for more. I know of some people who couldn’t make it through a day without hours of the Wiles-Leal-Quayle brand of fear and disparagement. They would have withdrawal symptoms if they just turned it all off.

      This is sad, because its clearly what the apostles warned of when they spoke about a day when leaders in the church would turn us away from the true gospel, and feed us a false message to tickle our ears. The people doing this face a fearsome future judgment from God because as you point out they bear a greater responsibility and God will hold them to a higher standard.

      We should keep these men in our prayers, as they are in great danger of perishing unless they turn around the focus of their ministries and return to the gospel.

      All blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  5. Anne says:

    You are an evil smug man and a total coward. You write your little blog in anonymity and then dare to call those who lay it ALL on the line cowards. Hell is very hot and those who reject the works of the Holy Spirit and call it false are in danger of spending eternity there. The BIBLE calls that Blaspheme of the Holy Spirit….you are well on your way. And FYI you are apparently computer inept…because anyone can see what is on Facebook. You should take a class and learn something useful. Your rejection of the Holy Spirit is fairly typical for Canadians.

    • I don’t “reject the work of the Holy Spirit.” What a completely mindless comment to make.

      Obviously what I reject is falsehood proclaimed in the name of the Holy Spirit. Lets make it easy for you, Anne. Tell us all here at the blog specifically which prophetic words of the many dozens uttered by Nathan Leal in the past 5 years have been fulfilled? Oh, I see. What’s that you say? None. Right? Absolutely none. And its me blaspheming the Holy Spirit?

      And I suppose you can just write off all the failures as being some kind of “communication problem” the Watchman has with the Holy Spirit? I suppose you actually think that the Holy Spirit tries and tries, and tries again, but simply cannot find a way to get through clearly to his watchman, and this results in all the missed prophecies?

      Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit occurs when you declare falsehood in the name of the Spirit, and then when proven to be wrong, you knowingly continue to engage in this horrific practice. Supporters of false prophets will receive much the same fate as Scripture tells us awaits the false prophets themselves. Continue down this road of coddling and protecting false prophets, and you may well be facing the same fiery fate you are declaring for me.

      In prophecy, its one strike, and you’re out. You don’t get to keep trying to hit the ball, hoping to get lucky one time. Once a single declaration has been falsely made in the Holy name of God, you are a truly evil person if you continue down the same path.

      Jesus warned about false prophets so much because he knew how dangerous they are. Anne, you are living proof of just how much damage they can do. All snippety and vulgar in your defense of the sinister false prophets, and never do I hear a single word from you in defense of the gospel.

      You would literally die to defend the words of men, but you wouldn’t even get off your living room couch to defend the Word of God.

      JD Ellis

  6. John says:

    “Anne’s” comment about Canadians is blatantly ignorant…… but expected.

    She teems with hatred and self righteousness, both online and in person.

    She has a hard time containing herself once she considers you a slanderer of her prophet.

    • Yes, she really doesn’t acquit herself very well in her lame defenses of the false prophets. Its usually just a slur of some kind which she slings at me, thinking that’s going to make her side right. The last thing you’ll ever see is Anne, or M.A., or any of the Watchman fanatics, or even Nathan himself, using proper scriptural exegesis to uphold their beliefs.

      One would think that a Christian minister and/or his followers would at some point realize that if God’s word doesn’t support what is being said, its time to change your walk and follow Christ instead. But the spiritually blind continue to lead the spiritually dead in a death march to oblivion. Just like so much of the New Testament said would come to pass.

      All blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  7. John says:

    A reply regarding Steven’s comment about Quayle… In effort to be fair, Quayle (anytime I’ve listened) promoted the gospel of Christ not “physical preparation” as first and foremost, then physical prep as secondary to that. As far as Quayle’s bragging is concerned (as I saw mentioned elsewhere), I’ve heard him say things that seem to be self-promoting but instead was an effort to correct slanders or fallacies said about what he either said or did whether it was because of a person’s honest error or agenda against him. As far as his prep business is concerned; in my opinion, if he makes money selling camping gear and food ect., which is his area of interest, it doesn’t warrent criticism anymore than a preacher who also sells car insurance or a runs a produce stand.
    If it’s an honest living, it’s an honest living in my opinion..but perhaps we should discuss the perimeters of a proper biblical business.
    I’m not a “false-prophet defender”. (Quayle hasn’t claimed to be a prophet as far as I’ve heard). Is he capable of error? Yes. Should we hold him accountable? Yes. I think things being exposed on this website is helping christians, however the critcism should be fair (I realize the commenter isn’t the author).

    God Bless

    • In regards to your comments, I make the following observations:

      Quayle (anytime I’ve listened) promoted the gospel of Christ not “physical preparation” as first and foremost, then physical prep as secondary to that.

      Well, I’ve listened to him on many occasions, over the course of several years, and I’ve had quite a different experience. I’ve found that he seldom makes more than passing or token reference to the gospel of Jesus Christ, and when he even mentions God at all his main emphasis lies not in the gospel but on what the Holy Spirit has supposedly revealed to him concerning coming events in America. These events almost always involve destruction, devastation, and turmoil, resulting in a need for “preparation” on the part of his listeners.

      And what is his formula for preparing ourselves as Christians? Dedicated preaching of the gospel to all those who are perishing, as we await the coming of our Lord? Not at all. The preparation he advises is to buy survival products designed for the survival of the physical body, and gold for bartering needed goods. And guess what? He just happens to SELL these needed items.

      So let me get this straight. A preacher and proponent of the gospel of Jesus Christ is being given new revelation from God through the Holy Spirit, and he is personally profiting from this information from heaven. Talk about your ultimate conflict of interest. Is there a single precedent in all of scripture where a prophetic revelation was given in which the prophet personally gained physical resources or wherewithal from passing on the revelation from God?

      There are only 2 possibilities here.

      (1) He is actually hearing from God, and has decided to reap personal financial gain from the gracious presence and the divine glorious agency of the Holy Spirit’s work in him;
      (2) He does not really hear from the Holy Spirit at all, and he fraudulently misrepresents his “prophetic” revelations, and proceeds to collect financial largesse from the effects of his listeners believing that this is God speaking.

      I can’t decide which is more despicable. But I can tell you that if, in even the slightest way, you receive spiritual guidance from this man, your soul is in grave peril. Christ taught quite clearly that the victims of the wolves who prey on the flock receive the same eternal fate as the false prophets themselves. That is why there is so much in the New Testament warning of the dangers of false prophets.

      I’ve heard him say things that seem to be self-promoting but instead was an effort to correct slanders or fallacies said about what he either said or did whether it was because of a person’s honest error or agenda against him.

      How about his own Christian testimony? Surely the personal testimony of a Christian can be relied on to tell a perfectly unblemished, unbiased, story of who that person is, untarnished by the slander of others. I invite all those who consider this man a good influence on the elect in the church today to listen to his own Christian testimony in his own words.

      Let me know how far you make it into this video before it dawns on you that this is a man who preaches a gospel of his own heart, a false gospel. This testimony is full of falsehoods which directly contradict the Bible. Jesus appeared to him “in the flesh?” He stood before the “judgment seat of Christ?” Both clearly impossible, to anyone who has even a rudimentary understanding of scripture.

      Are his pronouncements of personal accomplishments during his life in a self-aggrandising manner reflective of his love for Christ? This man is a demon, and it is beyond my ability how anyone can defend his heretical antics. He is a modern day Pied Piper, leading thousands to eternal destruction.

      May the truth of God’s word shine its light to reveal the sinister falsehoods contained in the deepest, darkest strongholds of men who wish to establish their words and their gospels as the Christian standard for belief, and rewrite the meaning of truth as their terrible legacy.

      Those who are truly of the flock will have no trouble seeing this for what it truly is.

      May God bless you,
      JD Ellis

    • John says:

      I haven’t listened to the video yet but plan to. I do have to ask. When you say “soul” do you mean spirit or simply mind (will, emotions)? I assume you mean spirit to which I have to say my spirit is set for eternity with Christ Jesus so my spirit is not in “grave peril”…I have been challanged by some things Quayle has said in the past.. God can speak to anyone through anyone as he did the donkey…Be careful not to pass quick judgement such as that.

    • He talks frequently “about” the gospel of Jesus Christ, but only in as much as to mention that he follows it. The main bulk of his discussions do not involve anything concerning the gospel, but involve one or all of the following topics:

      (1) How persecuted and hounded he is by his detractors, which he claims range from the FBI to top secret government agencies. He seems to take pride in the idea that he is on the radar screens of high level intelligence agents. The truth is neither the FBI nor any other government agency could care less about any information Steve Quayle has, or anything he has done. This is all a persona he has chosen in order to give an aura of mystery and authority behind what he says.

      (2) Over the years he has clearly made survival the key theme of his talks, and even as a source of his income. There is nothing wrong with a man selling goods and services in a free market, but lets call that for what it is, and not misname it as a “Christian ministry.”

      (3) He claims to have met Jesus Christ “in the flesh.” I would be the last person to want to deny a valid religious experience, and I agree God can do anything, but if no red flags go up in a person’s mind when they hear a claim that someone met Jesus Christ “in the flesh”, then there is a distinct lack of biblical discernment being applied.

      My problem with the whole bunch of them, whether its Rick Wiles, or Nathan Leal, or Steve Quayle, is that they claim to be presenting the gospel of Jesus Christ, when it is actually the gospel of survival, doom, conspiracy, and speculation that they present. All of 2nd Peter Chapter 2 applies to these men.

      JD Ellis

  8. Ward says:

    Hello, I read what you wrote here. And though I don’t 100% agree with it, because carnally you guys are trying to achieve something that only the Spirit can achieve, however it is needed. With the both there is most definitely truth there. There is a balance. Everything is not always black or white. Only the Lord starts every individuals faith and concludes every individuals faith. I wont personally try to attack you like I read from others. We all need faith in the Lord Jesus. And we all need to endure to the end. I care about you after reading this. The Lord bless both you and me. Take care.

    • Blessings Ward.

      How true that only the Lord starts our faith, and concludes it. So many false teachers today are preaching that we determine our eternal destiny by exercising our human wisdom in making “free will” choices to accept the atoning act on the cross. If left to our own choices, which emanate from the dark recesses of our fallen nature, none of us would on our own choose Christ. I’m so glad God chose me, because if left to my own devices, who knows how I might have chosen.

      In Christ,
      JD Ellis

  9. Ward says:

    I was once reading a testimony of a African minister who said he went on a vision to Heaven. And he said there was a tree there in Heaven with 12 different fruits on it. And the Angel said the 12 fruits were the 12 fruits of the Spirit in the book of Galatians. And that every person must fulfill the 12 fruits to enter Heaven. Well, I went to Galatians (out of interest, not a real spiritual testing of the spirit type of thing) to count the fruits in Galatians and only counted 9 there. Just thought that humor my help here. That deleted that vision for me at the start of it. I quit reading it. I believe we would all do well to consider what everybody says carefully. Rather they use the bible or not.

    Take care.

    • A true Christian holds everything one hears up to the litmus test of whether or not it conforms to scriptural truth. A person claiming to speak a spiritual truth but their statement does not conform to what God has revealed to us in his written word is to be rejected.

      It really is that simple, and yet I get so-called Christian people telling me all the time how foolish I am to think the Bible is all we need to fight our Christian battles. It is a testimony to the wiles of the devil that so many deceitful people (especially on the internet) can find a large Christian audience for statements and theories that are totally rejected out of hand by scripture. Satan depends on people not being knowledgeable about the Bible, because he needs this ignorance to parade his wares and draw souls away from the only gospel that saves, the gospel of Jesus Christ.

      All blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  10. Kim says:

    Reblogged this on DiscernIt and commented:

    “So many ministries today treat faith as a commodity to be promoted, marketed, and sold. We have all listened to these hour long internet broadcasts which focus on everything from how evil the secular government is, to the latest government conspiracy, and if we just send in our donations, they will be able to continue to channel this badly-needed information to Christians everywhere. When not one word of the gospel has been preached, can we still call this a “Christian” broadcast or ministry? “

  11. Mike/ Marissa says:

    Anne – Please consider meditating on a quote that Charles Spurgeon penned, “[Satan] can make men dance upon the brink of hell, as though they were on the verge of heaven.”
    And do you recall, Jesus commands His children to ‘Love one another.’ 1 John.

    JD – – This link was shared to me by a friend who contributes various articles to this ministry, so I thought to pass it along to you and anyone else who might be interested in checking it out.

    Thank you for all your insight JD! “Fight the GOOD fight!”

    • Thanks Mike and Marissa. There’s no one like Charles Spurgeon for a quote that fits everything in the perfect biblical context where it belongs. I am currently reading a terrific new biography of Spurgeon by Tom Nettles. I highly recommend it for insight into one of the most creative Christian minds of all time.

      Thanks for the link to the website. A very interesting discernment site.

      All blessings in Christ,
      JD Ellis

  12. Hugh McCann says:

    We agree with your article and with the Cam. Dec. solas.

    These are embraced by Presbyterians, Reformed Baptists, Anglicans, and Lutherans.

    But strangely & sadly ironic is the fact that the Cam. Dec. -along with your piece- quotes no Scripture proofs!

    • The Cambridge Declaration was meant as a set of biblical standards for churches to follow. I don’t think it was meant to be an all-encompassing exegesis of each position, but as a finished creed in summary form. And this was true of my article as well. The exegesis of how each portion of the declaration is supported biblically is contained in all the varied works of the reformers like Owen, Knox, Calvin, Luther, Zwingli, and dozens of others, who wrote hundreds of volumes of exegesis of their positions. A creedal statement of position such as the Cambridge Declaration is meant to be a summary statement of confession.

      JD Ellis

  13. Hugh McCann says:

    Of course, JD,

    But to plow through those “hundreds of volumes” would take a few lifetimes, whereas confessions such as the WCF, Savoy, 2nd LBCF, and the myriad catechisms and other Reformation docs contain the Scripture proofs. We can’t hope to convince people apart from the word of God, brother.

    But the Cambridge is great, and I for one appreciate your posting it with your comments!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s